Civil Rights Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 63
Michael Lehtonen v. Governor of the Virgin Islands, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-2063
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL P. LEHTONEN
Defendant - Appellee: GOVERNOR OF THE VIRGIN ISLANDS, VINCENT F. FRAZER, DAVID PAYNE, JR. and others
Norma Picard-Samuel, et al v. Virgin Islands Joint Board of, et al
as 13-2007
Plaintiff - Appellant: NORMA PICARD-SAMUEL, WILMA MARSH-MONSANTA, LAWRENCE OLIVE and others
Defendant - Appellee: VIRGIN ISLANDS JOINT BOARD OF ELECTIONS, ST. CROIX BOARD OF ELECTIONS, JOHN ABRAMSON, JR. and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-1293
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Judd v. State Board of Elections, et al
as 12-3601
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee: STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF THE US VIRGIN ISLANDS and GOVT OF THE VI
Keith Judd v. Virgin Islands Board of Electi, et al
as 12-2597
Plaintiff - Appellant: KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant - Appellee: VIRGIN ISLANDS BOARD OF ELECTIONS and GOVERNMENT VIRGIN ISLANDS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2256
Plaintiff - Appellant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Type: Civil Rights Jobs
Bryant v. The People and Government of the United States Virgin Islands We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00087
Plaintiff: Sheara Bryant
Defendant: The People and Government of the United States Virgin Islands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv01112
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635
Aponte-Rosario, et al v. Jackson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1362
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARCADIO APONTE-ROSARIO, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project, MIRTA COLON-PELLICIER, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project and IRIS MARGARITA APONTE-MARRERO, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project
Plaintiff: ROSSANA DE-LEON-RIVERA, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project and LUZ ELENA RAMOS-AYALA, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project
Defendant - Appellee: ALPHONSO JACKSON, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, OLGA SAEZ, Housing Director of the Office for the Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and MICHAEL COLON, Director, Field Office
Defendant: SHAUN DONOVAN, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, ANIBAL ACEVEDO VILA, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, CARLOS LABOY, Director of the Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration and others
:
Aponte-Rosario, et al v. Acevedo Vila, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1200
Plaintiff - Appellant: ARCADIO APONTE-ROSARIO, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project, MIRTA COLON-PELLICIER, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project and IRIS MARGARITA APONTE-MARRERO, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project
Plaintiff: ROSSANA DE-LEON-RIVERA, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project and LUZ ELENA RAMOS-AYALA, as Resident of Las Gladiolas Public Housing Project
Defendant - Appellee: ANIBAL ACEVEDO VILA, Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, JORGE RIVERA, Secretary of the Department of Housing of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and CARLOS LABOY, Director of the Puerto Rico Public Housing Administration
Defendant: ALPHONSO JACKSON, Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, MICHAEL COLON, Director, Field Office, OLGA SAEZ, Housing Director of the Office for the Puerto Rico/Virgin Islands of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development and others
: and

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?