Civil Rights Cases filed in Arizona
Cases 61 - 70 of 120
Davis v. Tucson, City of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2014cv02596
Plaintiff: Rita Davis
Defendant: Tucson, City of, Tucson Police Department and Anthony Kadous
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02497
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Molino et al v. Sandoval et al
as 2:2014cv02460
Plaintiff: Steven G Molino and SM Investments LLC
Defendant: Anthony Sandoval, Daryl Garcia and Michael C Shiel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shurts v. Flagstaff, City of et al
as 3:2014cv08121
Plaintiff: Jaime Lynne Shurts
Defendant: Flagstaff, City of , PC Village Association Incorporated, Ron Shurts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jackson v. Maricopa, County of et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv01293
Defendant: Maricopa, County of and Maricopa County Superior Court
Plaintiff: Anthony Dean Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Demaree et al v. Peoria, City of et al
as 2:2014cv01254
Defendant: Linda F Johnson, Kenneth P Deibert , Janice A Mickens and others
Plaintiff: Lisa Demaree and Anthony Demaree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bourque v. Huseinovic et al
as 2:2014cv00796
Plaintiff: Anthony Bourque
Defendant: Suvad Huseinovic and Unknown Huseinovic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00407
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Miano v. Donahoe et al
as 2:2014cv00291
Plaintiff: Anthony D Miano
Defendant: Patrick Donahoe and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 791
Funck v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2013cv02542
Plaintiff: Amber Funck
Defendant: Joseph M Arpaio, Ava Arpaio, Maricopa, County of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?