Cases 61 - 70 of 160
KAREN F. NEWTON REVOCABLE TRUST et al v. CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP
as 4:2019cv00429
Plaintiff:
SANDRA GRAHAM, DEBBIE CHESNEY, JANET ANDERS and others
Defendant:
CANADIAN REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Wickham et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 6:2019cv00241
Defendant:
Christopher Wray, Ricky Adams, Gil J Altom, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Paul LeRoy Wickham and Jennifer Leann McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Gallagher v. Wray et al
as 3:2019cv00930
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Investigation, Bill Priestap and Christopher Wray
Plaintiff:
Ryan Gallagher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Motto Jr v. Mullins et al
as 6:2019cv00129
Defendant:
Vince Mullins, Donald Trump, Cheryl Sanders and others
Plaintiff:
Frank John Motto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00242
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Counter Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Freeland et al v. Tarrant County, Texas et al
as 4:2018cv00845
Defendant:
Tarrant County, Texas and Sheriff Bill E. Waybourn
Plaintiff:
Josh Freeland and Taylor Freeland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lutz v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2018cv00341
Plaintiff:
Joe L. Lutz
Defendant:
Bill Waybourn, Paul Duncan, John Mills , MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Orsburn v. City of Euless, Texas et al
as 4:2018cv00222
Plaintiff:
Courtney Orsburn
Defendant:
City of Euless, Texas, Bill Norwood and Police Officer Does 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Backyard Partners LLC v. City of Bee Cave et al
as 1:2018cv00162
Plaintiff:
Backyard Partners LLC
Defendant:
City of Bee Cave, Bill Goodwin, Kara King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
