Cases 61 - 70 of 172
CLARK v. TSA TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADM.
as 3:2019cv00209
Plaintiff:
CAROLINE CLARK
Defendant:
TSA TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADM.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
COCHREN v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. et al
as 4:2019cv00162
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPT. and INDIANA STATE POLICE
Plaintiff:
TERRY COCHREN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTRIDGE v. CLARKSVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2019cv00128
Defendant:
CLARK COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, INDIANA STATE POLICE POST 45, MATHEW ADAMS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DARREN EASTRIDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FREDERICK et al v. LAWSON et al
as 1:2019cv01959
Plaintiff:
MARY J FREDERICK, WILLIAM L MARKS, JR., JOHN JUSTIN COLLIER and others
Defendant:
M CATHERINE FINELLO, CONNIE LAWSON, RITA L GLENN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EASTRIDGE v. CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL et al
as 4:2019cv00096
Plaintiff:
JAMES DARREN EASTRIDGE
Defendant:
CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, CLARK MEMORIAL HOSPITAL BEHAVIORAL HEALTH and JOEL P. VELASCO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
THORNTON v. DIENHART et al
as 1:2019cv01680
Defendant:
MAYOR JOE HOGSETT, RYAN DIENHART, ERIC SNOWDEN and others
Plaintiff:
RANDY THORNTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00090
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clark v. DeKalb County Sheriff et al
as 1:2018cv00387
Plaintiff:
Thomas J Clark and Thomas Clark
Defendant:
DeKALB COUNTY SHERIFF DONALD LAUER, T. McCormick, T. Olinske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COTTRELL v. CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT et al
as 4:2018cv00200
Defendant:
MIKE HAMMOND, CLARK COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, BRAD JONES and others
Plaintiff:
GREG COTTRELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00819
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
