Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Connor v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2009cv01683
Plaintiff:
David Connor
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Carl Sanders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00604
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Glasgow v. Allen
as 2:2008cv00801
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Glasgow, Kenneth Glasgow, Kenneth Glasgow and others
Defendant:
Richard Allen and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Williams v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv00824
Plaintiff:
DeNorris Williams and DeNorris Williams
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Richard F. Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Arthur v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2007cv00342
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Arthur
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Richard Allen, Holman Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:1994cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Movant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cross_claimant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
