Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 69 of 69
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00768
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Phulis James v. SSK Properties et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2008cv00129
Plaintiff: Phylis James and Phylis James
Defendant: SSK Properties, Japan Grill, Inc. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00581
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2007cv00478
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01811
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Caston v. Japan Government
as 2:2007cv00738
Plaintiff: Charles Caston
Defendant: Japan Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00730
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Muhammad et al v. Extra Space Storage et al
as 2:2007cv00478
Plaintiff: Charles Muhammad, Casino's Las Vegas, Reno, Japan, Vietnam and others
Defendant: Extra Space Storage, U.S. Senate et al, U.S. Congress and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caston et al v. Mexico President John Doe et al
as 2:2007cv00489
Plaintiff: Charles Caston, Las Vegas & Reno Casinos and Japan, North Korea
Defendant: Mexico President John Doe, Clear Channel Radio & Advertisement Company, Radio One and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?