Cases 61 - 70 of 78
Joseph v. City of Orlando et al
as 6:2012cv00131
Plaintiff:
Malenne Joseph
Defendant:
City of Orlando , Jose Varela , Robert Wesley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Paulo Mailo, Jr. v. Adam Crail, et al
as 12-15164
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAULO MAILO, Jr.
Defendant - Appellee:
ADAM CRAIL, SHIRLEY PICO, CARLA V. KEKAUOHA, MPO and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv07342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Mailo v. Crail et al
as 1:2011cv00566
Plaintiff:
Paulo Mailo, Jr.
Defendant:
Adams Crail, Shirley Pico, Carla V. Kekauoha and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hernandez v. City of Oakley et al
as 3:2011cv02415
Plaintiff:
Juan Hernandez
Defendant:
City of Oakley , City of Oakley Police Department, Contra Costa County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
REEVES v. OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER et al
as 2:2011cv01741
Plaintiff:
DARREL REEVES
Defendant:
OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER, HOPE MITCHEL, MARTHA ROYSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv01442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
James Davis v. City of Las Vegas, et al
as 11-15407
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ANTHONY DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LAS VEGAS, CLARK COUNTY, NEVADA, STATE OF NEVADA and others
LUCY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2010cv06641
Plaintiff:
CHARLES P. LUCY, JR.
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, THE BERGEN COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, THE OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. State of Georgia, Fulton County et al
as 1:2010cv03202
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Foster
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Fulton County, Superior Court of Fulton County and Office of the Public Defender
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
