Cases 61 - 70 of 1,544
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
(PS) McGee v. State of California et al
as 2:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Jefferson A. McGee
Defendant:
State of California, The Governor of California, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv24881
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diaz v. Cantu
as 24-50026
Plaintiff:
Enriqueta Diaz
Defendant:
Ramsey Enlish Cantu, Maverick County Judge, Roxanna Rios, Commissioner Precinct 2, Olga Ramos, Commissioner Precinct 3 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv23202
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CASEY v. AT&T INC et al
as 5:2023cv00318
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE LEE CASEY
Defendant:
AT&T INC, INDENTURE TRUSTEE, THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY NA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00269
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
