Cases 61 - 70 of 1,599
Gold v. Medical Board of California et al
as 2:2023cv02387
Plaintiff:
Simone M. Gold
Defendant:
Medical Board of California and Kristina Lawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07796
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Simon v. Bayada Home Health Care, Inc.
as 1:2023cv02718
Plaintiff:
Jessica Simon
Defendant:
Bayada Home Health Care, Inc.
Farrakhan et al v. Anti-Defamation League et al
as 1:2023cv09110
Plaintiff:
Nation of Islam, Louis Farrakhan and Minister Louis Farrakhan
Defendant:
Anti-Defamation League, Simon Wiesenthal Center, Johnathan Greenblatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ct Diversity-(Citizenship)
Rice v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv01382
Plaintiff:
Brian K Rice
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Kenneth Boswell, Ray L Watts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv20889
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv08699
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01323
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GAIA GARDENS, LLC et al v. TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR
as 2:2023cv20733
Plaintiff:
GAIA GARDENS, LLC, PETER PAUL LANDSCAPERS, LLC, CARUSO PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC and others
Defendant:
TOWNSHIP OF MONTCLAIR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
