Cases 61 - 70 of 73
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2011cv00504
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chappell v. Chase Bank/Home Finance LLC et al (MAG+)
as 2:2010cv01026
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Chappell
Defendant:
Chase Bank/Home Finance LLC, Regions Bank, Compass Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bethel et al v. Baldwin County Department of Human Resources et al
as 1:2010cv00614
Plaintiff:
Orlando Bethel and Glynis Bethel
Defendant:
Baldwin County Department of Human Resources, Bob Riley, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bozeman v. City of Montgomery, Alabama et al
as 2:2010cv00677
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Bozeman
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Alabama, A. D. Baylor and James J.M. Stewart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv01865
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00757
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Stewart-Magee v. United States Air Force et al
as 2:2009cv00239
Plaintiff:
Brian Stewart-Magee
Defendant:
United States Air Force, Department of Defense, Air Force, Secretary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
