Cases 61 - 70 of 659
Hubbard v. Wallenstein et al
as 3:2023cv00202
Plaintiff:
Marc Hubbard
Defendant:
Marc A. Wallenstein, William A. Harrison, Leslie E. Osbourne, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. United States of America
as 4:2023cv00057
Plaintiff:
William Taylor
Defendant:
United States of America
Ardis v. Dickey et al
as 5:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Robert Michael Ardis
Defendant:
Darlene Dickey, William Eddins, Sarah Harper-Crutchfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
STRATTON v. CITY OF KANNAPOLIS et al
as 1:2023cv00095
Plaintiff:
KATHY STRATTON
Defendant:
CITY OF KANNAPOLIS, J. M. LIVENGOOD, M. T. HOEHMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DAVIS v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
WILMA KAY DAVIS
Defendant:
KEVIN AUSTIN, J. GREGORY MATTHEWS, VALARIE ZACHARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv00010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Mitchell v. City of Charlotte et al
as 3:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Kyre Mitchell
Defendant:
City of Charlotte, Kerr Putney, Johnny Lee Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
