Civil Rights Cases filed in West Virginia
Cases 71 - 80 of 190
Tomashek v. Raleigh County Emergency Operating Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv01904
Plaintiff: Philip J. Tomashek, II
Defendant: Raleigh County Emergency Operating Center , John Zilinski , Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
A.E. et al v. Nield et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv01885
Plaintiff: A. E. and E. W.
Defendant: Joshua Nield, City of Huntington, West Virginia and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv11276
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Akers v. Justus et al
as 1:2016cv10579
Plaintiff: Aaron Akers
Defendant: Ralph W. Justus, Benjamin D. Gillespie and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv10519
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tolliver v. Justus et al
as 1:2016cv10160
Plaintiff: Antonio R. Tolliver
Defendant: Ralph W. Justus, Christopher S. Kane, Jacob C. Mann and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe, et al. v. Board of Education of the County of Mercer We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv08318
Plaintiff: John Doe and M. Doe
Defendant: Board of Education of the County of Mercer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodrum v. Farley et al
as 2:2016cv06163
Plaintiff: Dewey Woodrum
Defendant: Ken Farley, JJ Napier and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Farley et al
as 2:2016cv06162
Plaintiff: Joseph Ellis
Defendant: Ken Farley, JJ Napier and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Farley et al
as 2:2016cv06161
Plaintiff: Keith Ellis
Defendant: Ken Farley, JJ Napier and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?