Cases 71 - 80 of 90
Van Boven v. Karlsen et al
as 1:2017cv00279
Defendant:
Marianne Karlsen and Josh Love
Plaintiff:
Dr. Robert Van Boven, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Robinson v. Meeks et al
as 3:2017cv00606
Defendant:
Randy Meeks , Josh Robinson , William Witten and others
Plaintiff:
Deanna J Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ferguson v. Dunn et al
as 1:2016cv00272
Plaintiff:
Ralph Lynn Ferguson, Jr
Defendant:
Eric Marcine Dunn, Charles Willis, Josh Beckman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amrhein v. United States of America, et al
as 4:2016cv00223
Plaintiff:
Darlene C Amrhein
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, Joseph Robinette Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Runkle v. State of Texas et al
as 5:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Bryce Joseph Runkle
Defendant:
State Of Texas , Josh R. Morriss, III , Jack E Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Runkle v. State of Texas et al
as 1:2015cv01141
Defendant:
Justice Ralph K Burgess, Justice Jack E Carter, Chief Justice Josh R. Morriss, III and others
Plaintiff:
Bryce Joseph Runkle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Breed v. City of Kirbyville, Texas et al
as 1:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
Shawntel Breed
Defendant:
City of Kirbyville, Texas , Paul Brister and Josh Hancock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Breed et al
as 1:2015cv00189
Defendant:
Shawntel Breed, City of Kirbyville, Texas, Paul Brister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Brister et al
as 1:2015cv00188
Defendant:
Paul Brister, Josh Hancock and City of Kirbyville, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hyatt et al v. Callahan County et al
as 1:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Randi Hyatt , Lea Wilkins , Alexis Hyatt and others
Defendant:
Callahan County , John Windham , Josh DeLaGarza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
