Cases 71 - 80 of 80
Fiorani v. www.ripoffreports.com et al
as 2:2008cv02373
Plaintiff:
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr.
Defendant:
www.ripoffreports.com, Albert Lowry, Entrepreneurial Systems, LLC. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Fiorani et al v. Lowry et al
as 2:2008cv02290
Plaintiff:
Rosario A. Fiorani, Jr. and WWW.ripoffreports.com
Defendant:
Albert Lowry, Entrepreneurial Systems, LLC., Education Advancement Inst. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pacheco v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv02240
Plaintiff:
Alvin Pacheco
Defendant:
Joseph Arpaio and Betty Adams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Guerrero v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2008cv02093
Plaintiff:
Eugenio Guerrero
Defendant:
Joseph M. Arpaio and Betty Adams
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Prusha et al v. Bell et al
as 2:2007cv01182
Plaintiff:
Virginia Prusha and John Prusha
Defendant:
Richard Bell, Does, Roes Corps and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cohen v. General Revenue Corporation
as 2:2007cv01057
Plaintiff:
Adam Harris Cohen
Defendant:
General Revenue Corporation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed et al v. Gilbert, Town of et al
as 2:2007cv00522
Plaintiff:
Clyde Reed, Clyde Reed, Clyde Reed and others
Defendant:
Gilbert, Town of and Adam Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed et al v. Town of Gilbert, Arizona et al
as 2:2007at10257
Plaintiff:
Clyde Reed and Good News Presbyterian Church
Defendant:
Town of Gilbert, Arizona and Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
