Cases 71 - 80 of 213
TURMAN v. DEJESUS et al
as 5:2018cv02749
Defendant:
THE CITY OF READING and OFFICER MISSAEL DEJESUS
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL LAMAR TURMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vielma et al v. Gruler et al
as 6:2018cv00884
Plaintiff:
Jose Vielma , Carmen Nilda Capo-Quinones , Bernedette Cruz and others
Defendant:
Adam Todd Gruler , John Does 1-20, John Does 21-30 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeJesus v. Lantern Community Services et al
as 1:2018cv04125
Plaintiff:
Alex DeJesus
Defendant:
Lantern Community Services and Michelle Hess
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Nix v. The City of Rochester
as 18-1356
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Corry G. Nix
Defendant - Appellee:
The City of Rochester, Rochester Police Department, Michael Johnson, Rochester City Police Officer and others
Defendant:
John Does(s), intended to be another Rochester City Police Officer(s) whose name(s) is/are not known to the Plaintiff and Nelson Justiano-DeJesus
DeJesus v. Franco et al
as 1:2018cv03596
Plaintiff:
Alex DeJesus
Defendant:
Michael Franco and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DeJesus v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv01814
Plaintiff:
Anthony DeJesus
Defendant:
City of Chicago , Chicago Police Officer Miguel Cordero, Star No. 18568 and Michael Cordero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01850
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00288
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CINTRON-GARCIA v. SANTIAGO-DEJESUS et al
as 5:2018cv00456
Plaintiff:
MARCELINA CINTRON-GARCIA
Defendant:
JESUS SANTIAGO-DEJESUS, DANIEL T. WHITE, C. MORAR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
