Cases 71 - 80 of 2,111
Doe K.B. v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority et al
as 2:2023cv03900
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe K.B.
Defendant:
SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Leslie Richards, Kenneth Divers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03865
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
WATSON v. APPLEGARTH et al
as 2:2023cv01725
Plaintiff:
ERIC JASON WATSON
Defendant:
OFFICER ROBERT APPLEGARTH, OFFICER LUCAS THOMPSON, DAVID JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03683
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
ROSADO v. WHITCRAFT et al
as 2:2023cv03717
Plaintiff:
GERONIMO F. ROSADO, JR.
Defendant:
JAMES A. WHITCRAFT, JERMIAH F. KANE, PGM REAL ESTATES & ASSOCIATES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03655
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GIBSON v. TIP TOWING AND RECOVERY, LLC et al
as 5:2023cv03677
Plaintiff:
RAINY GIBSON
Defendant:
TIP TOWING AND RECOVERY, LLC, JASONE DISENSO, JOHN DOE TOW GUY 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COCKERHAM v. DEFFENBAUGH
as 3:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL COCKERHAM
Defendant:
PAUL DEFFENBAUGH, ERIC/RICK PRICE, JOHN DOE 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
