Cases 71 - 80 of 81
Bannamon et al v. City of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2010cv00069
Plaintiff:
Valparisia R. Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
City of Fayetteville, Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00131
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 ra Job Discrimination (Race)
DALTON v. DIXSON et al
as 1:2009cv00383
Plaintiff:
DANNY LEE DALTON
Defendant:
PHILIP M. DIXSON and DERRICK H. ROBINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv00279
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Bannamon et al v. Iman et al
as 5:2009cv00115
Plaintiff:
Valparisia Bannamon and Moses W. Robinson
Defendant:
Dale Iman, Anthony G. Chavonne, Wesley A. Meredith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv00088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
LEWIS v. JORDON, et al
as 1:2009cv00021
Plaintiff:
JENNINGS RAY LEWIS
Defendant:
TRENTON JORDAN, TIM JORDON, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MATHIS et al v. GEO GROUP INC. et al
as 2:2008cv00021
Plaintiff:
KEITH MATHIS, REON HOLLOWAY, DAVID ROGERS and others
Defendant:
GEO GROUP INC., Federal Bureau of Prisons and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Unlawful Employment Practices
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
