Cases 71 - 80 of 238
WILLIAMS et al v. DESANTIS et al
as 1:2020cv00067
Plaintiff:
Williams, KATHLEEN WINTERS, TERRIAYNA SPILLMAN and others
Defendant:
DESANTIS, FLORIDA ELECTIONS CANVASSING COMMISSION, LAUREL M LEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfield v. Hallmark Companies et al
as 5:2020cv00079
Plaintiff:
Terry L Barfield
Defendant:
Hallmark Companies, Curtis Lowe, III and Virginia Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00139
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00095
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2020cv00041
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bey v. County of Columbia Third Judicial Circuit in and for the State of Florida (Dependency Court), et al.
as 3:2019cv01260
Plaintiff:
Chad Poppell, Yolanda Chaney, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
County of Columbia Third Judicial Circuit in and for the State of Florida (Dependency Court)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caplan v. Power Steering Auto Repair, Corp. et al
as 0:2019cv62446
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
POWER STEERING AUTO REPAIR, CORP., TERRY A. BOWMAN and CAROL LOVINS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01627
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2019cv01388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Goldman v. Abbott-Dickenson et al
as 8:2019cv01537
Defendant:
Centennial Bank, Rosanna Abbott-Dickenson, Ian Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman and All Style Tile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
