Cases 71 - 80 of 877
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Johnson v. Capital One Banking, Inc et al
as 1:2023cv00198
Plaintiff:
William J Johnson
Defendant:
Capiton One Banking, Inc, Capitol One Banking, Capital One Banking, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lape v. Williams, et al.
as 1:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Hayli Lape
Defendant:
Shanthon Williams, Sheriff Heath Jackson and County Commission of Escambia County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harrison v. Williams, et al.
as 1:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Crystal Michelle Harrison and Crystal M. Harrison
Defendant:
Shanthon Williams, Sheriff Heath Jackson and County Commission of Escambia County, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grissom v. Roberts et al
as 2:2023cv00116
Plaintiff:
Mark Grissom
Defendant:
Annah Roberts, Hayes Webb, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Diver v. Shelby County Alabama et al
as 2:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
William K Diver
Defendant:
Shelby County Alabama, John Samaniego, Mark Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams v. Norsworthy et al
as 2:2022cv01616
Plaintiff:
Jeremy C Williams
Defendant:
J Norsworthy and Birmingham, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv01608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
