Cases 81 - 90 of 245
TALBERT v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv04378
Plaintiff:
CHARLES TALBERT
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., M. HAQUE and LEPLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAUDILL v. IZUEGBU et al
as 5:2017cv00230
Plaintiff:
JASON M CAUDILL
Defendant:
MOSES NDUKWE IZUEGBU, MISSY LYNN MARLOW , P WHIDDON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
ROBINSON v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03868
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ROBINSON
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., ROBIN CLEMONS, ROSEANN GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fultz v. Indiana State of et al
as 3:2017cv00628
Plaintiff:
Michael Fultz
Defendant:
Indiana State of , Corizon Health Inc and Officer Shelby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
UNDERWOOD v. ALVEY et al
as 3:2017cv00122
Defendant:
SHIRLEY ALLARD, KATHY ALVEY, CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
LONNIE UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04482
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Estate of Ronald Alexander Howard, II, Deceased, by: Cathy Pack, Personal Representative v. Holzman et al
as 3:2017cv00778
Plaintiff:
Estate of Ronald Alexander Howard, II, Deceased, by: Cathy Pack, Personal Representative
Defendant:
Martin I. Holzman, Vernon P. Montoya, Joseph Fares and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOYD v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2017cv03195
Plaintiff:
LESLIE BOYD
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA , CURRAN-FROMHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY , CORIZON HEALTH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHARLESTON v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv03039
Defendant:
GERALD MAY, BRUCE BLATT, ELMEADA FRIAS and others
Plaintiff:
WAYNE CHARLESTON, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00738
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
