Civil Rights Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 186
Vincent Niepsuj v. Office Of Administrative Judge, et al
as 17-3690
Plaintiff - Appellant: VINCENT M. NIEPSUJ
Defendant - Appellee: OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE OF SUMMIT COUNTY DOMESTIC RELATIONS COURT and OFFICE OF CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE OHIO SUPREME COURT
Huffman v. State of Kansas Department of Children and Families et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02250
Plaintiff: Donna L. Huffman
Defendant: State of Kansas Department of Children and Families, Phyllis Gilmore, Brian Dempsey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Niepsuj v. Office of Administrative Judge of Summit County Domestic Relations Court et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2017cv00687
Plaintiff: Vincent M. Niepsuj
Defendant: Office of Administrative Judge of Summit County Domestic Relations Court and Office of Chief Justice of the Ohio Supreme Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-182
Plaintiff: Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant: Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-185
Plaintiff: Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant: Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. United States of America
as 17-180
Plaintiff: Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant: Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
King, Jr. et al v. New York State Unified Court System Office of Administration et al
as 1:2017cv00309
Defendant: New York State Unified Court System Office of Administration, New York State Appellate Division - First Judicial Department, New York State Appellate Division - Second Judicial Department and others
Plaintiff: Brian King, Jr. , Sonny B. Southeland, Sr. , Raelene Birkett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. United States of America
as 16-3941
Plaintiff: Kathleen Clark, as next best friend and parent, all as family filing individually, Ian Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually and Noah Clark, as next best friend and son, all as family filing individually
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michael Clark, individually and as parent and natural guardian, all as family filing individually
Defendant - Appellee: United States of America, Department of Justice, Administration for Children and Families and others
Clark v. Cuomo
as 16-3927
Plaintiff - Appellant: Michael Clark
Defendant - Appellee: Governor Andrew Cuomo, Eric T. Scheiderman, NYS Attorney General, New York State Unified Court System, 4th Judicial District and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv08327
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?