Cases 81 - 90 of 106
Ringbauer et al v. Hebert et al
as 6:2008cv00115
Defendant:
Sid Hebert, John Carter, Scott Clostio and others
Plaintiff:
Debora Buczek, John Clemens and Bill Ringbauer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Willis et al v. The United States of America et al
as 3:2011cv00100
Defendant:
Smitty Bell, Ann Charlton, Kurtis Melnick and others
Notice Only:
Michael D. Snyder
Plaintiff:
Albert L. Willis and Pauline Willis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Henderson v. Turner et al
as 3:2011cv00039
Defendant:
Unknown Covington, Unknown Owens, Unknown Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Latesha Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Turner v. Minden et al
as 5:2010cv01842
Plaintiff:
Shannon Kjamal Turner
Defendant:
City of Minden, Ryan Barnette and Chris McClaran
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv04321
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00631
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Woolsey v. Toney et al
as 3:2010cv01081
Defendant:
Royce Toney, Alan Yearby, Daryl C. Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Malcom Woolsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
huey v. Louisiana et al
as 3:2010cv01043
Defendant:
State of Louisiana , Louisiana Department of Social Services , debbie debbie smith and others
Plaintiff:
sallie faye huey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01789
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1988
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
