Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Lucien v. Brazil et al
as 1:2024cv11341
Plaintiff:
James Lucien
Defendant:
John Brazil, George Foley, William Mahoney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv11963
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv12088
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Cavitt v. Massachusetts Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv12479
Plaintiff:
Brian Keith Cavitt
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Abbe E. Nelligan, Joy Gallant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rosario v. Waterhouse et al
as 1:2019cv10532
Defendant:
William M Gilligan, John R Myers, City of Lowell and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Rosario
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Liviz v. Supreme Court of the United State of America, et al
as 1:2018cv12620
Defendant:
Michigan Supreme Court, Louisiana Supreme Court, Kansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Chief Jurist ilya Liviz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Shurtleff et al v. City of Boston et al
as 1:2018cv11417
Plaintiff:
Harold Shurtleff and Camp Constitution
Defendant:
City of Boston and Commissioner Gregory T. Rooney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coutlis v. Harold Shaw, et.al.
as 1:2017cv12423
Plaintiff:
Joseph Coutlis
Defendant:
Harold Shaw, Pericles Vergatos, Christos Sinos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Hourihan v. Robert Bitinas, et.al.
as 1:2016cv11734
Plaintiff:
Harold Hourihan
Defendant:
Robert Bitinas, Andrew McKenna, Paul MacDonald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Koltin v. City of Fall River et al
as 1:2014cv13749
Plaintiff:
Harold Koltin
Defendant:
City of Fall River, Fall River Police Department, William Flanagan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
