Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Hill v. City of Birmingham, The
as 2:2024cv00518
Plaintiff:
Brinceton Hill
Defendant:
City of Birmingham, The
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00448
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Scott v. Phillips et al
as 2:2023cv01773
Plaintiff:
Jemayel Scott
Defendant:
Trina Phillips, Richard Holtzman, Courtland Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Foster v. Pickens County et al
as 7:2023cv01647
Plaintiff:
Anny Pamela Foster
Defendant:
Pickens County, Pickens County Sheriff's Office, Pickens County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Doe v. Spring Hill College et al
as 1:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
Spring Hill College, Craig McVey, William Robert Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Richard v. Max Credit Union et al (MAG+)
as 2:2023cv00491
Plaintiff:
Chauncy Richard
Defendant:
Max Credit Union, Martin Head, Chambless Math and Carr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
