Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Cornish v. Town of New Britain et al
as 3:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
ORane M. Cornish, Jr.
Defendant:
Town of New Britain, Calvin Wentworth, Matthew Marino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Clark v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2023cv01527
Plaintiff:
Gordon Clark
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Office of Governor Ned Lamont, Ned Lamont and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01505
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chapman v. Karp et al
as 3:2023cv00424
Plaintiff:
Pamela Chapman
Defendant:
Jonathon Karp, Nancy Graham, Hope van Beuren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01431
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Oquendo v. Hartford et al
as 3:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
Jorge Oquendo
Defendant:
City of Hartford, Abhilash Pillai, Michael Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Lopez v. Groman et al
as 3:2022cv00378
Plaintiff:
Ramon Antonio Lopez
Defendant:
Paul Groman, Mike Brasch, Dennis Daigneault and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Taylor v. Planning & Zoning Commission et al
as 3:2021cv01023
Plaintiff:
William W. Taylor
Defendant:
Planning And Zoning Commission and Town of Westport
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
