Cases 1 - 10 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00161
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CROWELL v. HOGSETT et al
as 1:2023cv01787
Plaintiff:
JOHNNY CROWELL
Defendant:
JOE HOGSETT, RANDAL TAYLOR, ARRESTING OFFICER #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIERCKMAN v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2022cv02424
Plaintiff:
BENNETT DIERCKMAN
Defendant:
ANTHONY JOHNSON, JANE POE and KERRY FORESTAL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
POTTER v. INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2022cv01785
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE POTTER
Defendant:
INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, RANDAL TAYLOR, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
EL v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2021cv02199
Plaintiff:
CHEYOU EL
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, KROGER, INC, CPS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DUKE v. REID HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC.
as 1:2021cv02138
Plaintiff:
KERRI DUKE
Defendant:
REID HOSPITAL & HEALTH CARE SERVICES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra
POHLE v. PENCE et al
as 4:2020cv00139
Defendant:
JOHN G ROBERTS, JOE BIDEN, JOHN BRENNAN and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL L. POHLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00105
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
HUDGINS v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS et al
as 1:2020cv01074
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Hudgins
Defendant:
KERRY FORESTAL, MARION COUNTY SHERIFF, INDIANAPOLIS METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
POOLE v. HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION OF MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2019cv04718
Defendant:
HUA LUO, M.D., UNKNOWN MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPUTY #1, MATT A RUTZ, M.D. and others
Plaintiff:
SHANNON POOLE and KARY DANGLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
