Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lafollette v. Knox County et al
as 4:2019cv04060
Defendant:
Jason Marshall, Jackie Arthur, Nathan Messmore and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Lafollette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sweet Sage Cafe, LLC et al v. Town of North Redington Beach, Florida et al
as 8:2018cv01080
Plaintiff:
Sweet Sage Cafe, LLC , John Messmore , Shermee, LLC and others
Defendant:
Town of North Redington Beach, Florida and Bob Gualtieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv11227
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703
Allen et al v. City of East Peoria, Illinois
as 1:2014cv01224
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Allen , Kyle Campbell , Julie Campbell and others
Defendant:
City of East Peoria, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peoria Tazewell Pathology Grou, et al v. Jack Messmore, et al
as 11-3388
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEORIA TAZEWELL PATHOLOGY GROUP, S.C., CONSULTANTS IN CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, LTD., CONSULTANTS IN LABORATORY MEDICINE AND PATHOLOGY, LTD. and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JACK MESSMORE, Acting Director of the State of Illinois Department of Insurance, in his Official Capacity, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE, LISA MADIGAN and others
Peoria Tazewell Pathology Group, S.C. et al v. Messmore et al
as 1:2011cv04317
Plaintiff:
Peoria Tazewell Pathology Group, S.C. , Consultants in Clinical Pathology, Ltd. , Consultants in Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Ltd. and others
Defendant:
Jack Messmore , Illinois Department of Insurance , Lisa Madigan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hixon v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
as 2:2007cv01150
Defendant:
Paul Herman Chaffee and Nevada Department Of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Donald Hixon
Unknown:
A Wayne Carter, Martin I. Melendrez and Jeffrey W Messmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
