Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Long v. City of Princeton, West Virginia et al
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Franklin Long, Jr.
Defendant:
City of Princeton, West Virginia, Tim Gray and Kenneth Clay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Zappin v. Cipoletti et al
as 2:2021cv00119
Defendant:
Justice Bill Wooton, Justice John Hutchinson, Anne Lambright and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Zappin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Armstead et al
as 2:2020cv00641
Petitioner:
Barbara Terrell and Barbara Renner
Respondent:
Evan H. Jenkins, Elizabeth D. Walker, Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Field v. Farmer et al
as 1:2016cv00149
Plaintiff:
Dale P. Field, Jr.
Defendant:
David A. Farmer, Primecare Medical, Inc., Scott Villers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eggleston v. Burke et al
as 5:2016cv04451
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Eggleston
Defendant:
Austin G. Burke, Paul O'Dell, Joe Delong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadnax v. Pugh, et al
as 5:2015cv03736
Defendant:
Emmitt Pugh, Tim Deems, Jefferey S. Shumate and others
Plaintiff:
Ethelbert Clarence Defoli Broadnax
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trazell I v. Penn National Gaming Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv00004
Plaintiff:
Trazell I
Defendant:
Tim J. Wilmott, CRC Holdings, Inc., Hollywood Casino at Charles Town Races and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv08087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv08094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
