Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Donald v. Hamm et al
as 2:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Angela Donald
Defendant:
John Q. Hamm, John Crow and Gwendolyn Babers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Crafton v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00008
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Crafton
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, John Q. Hamm, Wendy Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CMB Holdings Group LLC v. Tuscaloosa, City of et al
as 7:2023cv00370
Plaintiff:
CMB Holdings Group LLC doing business as Twelve25 Sports Bar and Entertainment Venue
Defendant:
Tuscaloosa, City of, Walter Maddox, Lee Busby and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Wells v. Jones et al
as 2:2022cv00600
Plaintiff:
Angela Wells
Defendant:
Thomas Jones, Jennifer McCovery, Danarris Lovejoy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhine v. Staggs et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Elnora Rhine
Defendant:
Matthew Staggs, Corey Crowe, Robert Hood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00542
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Crow
as 2:2019cv01562
Defendant:
Calvin Crow
Plaintiff:
David Campbell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hardy v. Crow et al
as 2:2018cv00056
Plaintiff:
Antonio Hardy
Defendant:
John Crow, J. Sewell and Correctional Officer Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Crowe
as 2:2017cv00385
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michele Crowe
Cause Of Action: 50 U.S.C. § 501
Shuler et al v. Garrison et al
as 2:2016cv00695
Plaintiff:
Shuler, Roger Shuler and Carol Shuler
Defendant:
Garrison, Cliff Sims, Alabama Media Group and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
