Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Washington v Houston Marriott Sugar Land et al
as 4:2023cv02719
Plaintiff:
Mr. Keith Washington
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc. doing business as Houston Marriott Sugar Land doing business as Sugar Land Marriott Town Square, DVLL, LLC doing business as Ark of Safety Security Solutions, CPL Robert Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Collins v. Uhrig et al
as 1:2022cv00842
Plaintiff:
Darrell Collins
Defendant:
Jeff Uhrig, Christopher Ybarra, Brian Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peden et al v. Van Zandt County et al
as 6:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
Caitlann Peden , Michael G Peden , Estate of Michael L. Peden and others
Defendant:
Van Zandt County, Beth Turner, Colton Quick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00258
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Quick v. San Patricio County, Texas et al
as 2:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Chance Quick
Defendant:
San Patricio County, Texas, Jack McCarty, Michael Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00275
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01531
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv02061
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
