Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
DOE 4 et al v. MAPLES et al
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE 4 and JANE DOE 8
Defendant:
SCOTTIE MAPLES, DAVID LOWE, MARK MEYER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Gatton et al
as 1:2022cv00281
Estate Plaintiff:
Tamara Meyers
Defendant:
Marcus E Gatton, Jason Spencer, Sean Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Meyers v. Kelly et al
as 3:2021cv00735
Plaintiff:
Kevin W. Meyers
Defendant:
Officer Travis Jackson, Town of Walkerton, Eric Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ANDERSON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS et al v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2021cv01767
Plaintiff:
ANDERSON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, MARTINSVILLE CLASSROOM TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, AVON FEDERATION OF TEACHERS and others
Defendant:
TAMMY MEYER, TODD ROKITA and KATIE JENNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RASHID BEY v. MOORE et al
as 1:2020cv03200
Defendant:
ALAN WEIMER, ALLAN WILSON, ROBERT BAKER and others
Plaintiff:
AR RAZZAAQ RASHID BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rashid Bey v. Moore et al
as 1:2020cv00365
Defendant:
Tyler O Moore, Robert Baker, Mark Allan Hurt and others
Plaintiff:
Ar Razzaaq Rashid Bey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RASHID BEY v. MOORE et al
as 1:2020cv02683
Defendant:
ALLAN WILSON, ROBERT BAKER, MARK ALLAN HURT and others
Plaintiff:
AR RAZZAAQ RASHID BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00246
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
