Cases 1 - 10 of 403
v. Smith et al
as 5:2024cv00206
Defendant:
John Smith and 123 Police Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Robinson v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00829
Defendant:
J. Duggins, Rick Smith and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department
Plaintiff:
Cordaryl Robinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00496
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00489
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
SMITH v. HAMPTON et al
as 1:2024cv00632
Defendant:
K. ANTAL, THOMAS DOUB, K. LAWSON and others
Plaintiff:
PAUL MICHEAL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fincham et al v. McFadden et al
as 3:2024cv00636
Defendant:
C. Fleming, Garry L. McFadden, Mecklenburg County and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Robin and Russell Fincham, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00471
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00529
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
SMITH v. WINSTON SALEM NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00437
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Defendant:
DEA OFFICE OF PROFFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY WINSTON SALEM NC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
SMITH v. GREENSBORO NORTH CAROLINA DEA FEDERAL NARCOTIC AGENTS
as 1:2024cv00436
Defendant:
DEA OFFICE OF PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITY GREENSBORO NC
Plaintiff:
JUSTICE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
