Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01459
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Sharp v. Inspections Department, City of Montgomery, AL et al (MAG+)
as 2:2022cv00127
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Sharp
Defendant:
Inspections Department, City of Montgomery, AL, City of Montgomery, Alabama and City Council, City of Montgomery, AL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01267
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Scott v. Dunn et al
as 2:2021cv00573
Plaintiff:
Darryl Elton Scott
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Antonio McClain, Corrections Officer Hosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sharp v. City of Montgomery et al
as 2:2019cv00857
Defendant:
City of Montgomery, Barry Crabb, Todd Strange and others
Plaintiff:
Gary C. Sharp
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00956
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Sharp v. The City of Huntsville, Al. et al
as 5:2016cv01523
Plaintiff:
Michael K. Sharp
Defendant:
The City of Huntsville, Al., Huntsville Police Dept., R. H. Dickey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Holley v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv00439
Plaintiff:
Theresa Holley
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections , Kilby Correctional Facility , Corizon Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Pivnichny, et al. (MAG+)
as 2:2015cv00369
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Timothy Pivnichny, James Comey, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
