Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Velasquez v. McElroy et al
as 1:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
Diego Velasquez
Defendant:
Mary S. McElroy, Lynch and Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Thompson v. Hassett et al
as 1:2020cv00185
Plaintiff:
Anthony Mondrez Thompson
Defendant:
Garrett S. Hassett and Jeffrey Konieczny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00559
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
M.L. Hawk Realty, LLC et al v. Town of North Kingstown et al
as 1:2017cv00491
Plaintiff:
M.L. Hawk Realty, LLC , Mark L. Hawkins , Joshua L. Hawkins and others
Defendant:
Town of North Kingstown , North Kingstown Town Council , Richard A. Welch and others
Intervenor:
Rickey L Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oppenheimer et al v. Town of Charlestown Rhode Island et al
as 1:2015cv00154
Plaintiff:
Henry R Oppenheimer , Charles W More , Ronald D Newman and others
Defendant:
Town of Charlestown Rhode Island , Thomas B Gentz , George C Tremblay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrim
South Shore Mental Health Center, Inc. et al v. Town of Hopkinton et al
as 1:2007cv00454
Plaintiff:
South Shore Mental Health Center, Inc., Women's Development Corp. and H. Reed Cosper
Defendant:
Town of Hopkinton, Town of Hopkinton, Vincenzo Cordone and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Cahoon, Jr. et al v. Shelton et al
as 1:2007cv00008
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Cahoon, Jr., Raymond W. Cahoon, Jr., Joseph A. Nappa and others
Defendant:
Oscar Shelton, Oscar Shelton, Scott Avedisian and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
