Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Crowe et al v. Randles et al
as 3:2018cv00530
Defendant:
Bonnie Hommrich, James Moore, Wendy Patrick and others
Plaintiff:
A.C., L.C., E.B. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv00613
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Walker v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2015cv02340
Plaintiff:
Larry T. Walker
Defendant:
City of Memphis, State of Tennessee, County of Shelby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Wade et al
as 2:2013cv02167
Plaintiff:
Hattie L. King
Defendant:
Randy Wade, Steve Cohen, A.C. Wharton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stiles et al v. Grainger County School District et al
as 3:2013cv00007
Defendant:
Grainger County, TN , Grainger County Board of Education , Grainger County and others
Plaintiff:
Kelly Stiles and Kenny Fisher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2012cv02896
Plaintiff:
Yahoshua- Yisrael: Yahweh
Defendant:
City of Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Tony Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. City of Memphis, et al
as 2:2012cv02897
Plaintiff:
Yahoshua- Yisrael: Yahweh
Defendant:
City of Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Tony Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reed-Rajapakse v. Memphis Light Gas and Water et al
as 2:2012cv02807
Plaintiff:
Samantha Reed-Rajapakse
Defendant:
Memphis Light Gas and Water, Jerry Collins, City of Memphis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yahweh v. City of Memphis et al
as 2:2012cv02795
Plaintiff:
I-Ariel Daniel: ibn Yahweh
Defendant:
City of Memphis, A.C. Wharton, Toney Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
