Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities-Employment
Rejistre v. Ball
as 4:2024cv00425
Plaintiff:
Alexander Rejistre
Defendant:
Adam Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hebrard v. Does
as 4:2024cv00265
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Hebrard
Defendant:
Does Frank, Store Manager, Boll Well Pawn Store #3; Alexander, Merchant/Tender, Store #3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Alexander et al
as 3:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dwayne Wilcox
Defendant:
Gregg L. Alexander and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Prunty et al v. Obregon et al
as 3:2023cv00136
Plaintiff:
Sherry Renee Prunty and Gregory Alexander Prunty, Sr
Defendant:
Corey Obregon, Rick Elliot and Jonesboro, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Cullen v. Cantrell et al
as 6:2021cv06160
Plaintiff:
John Patrick Cullen
Defendant:
City of Hot Springs, Hot Springs Police Department, Jarrett Cantrell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Logan v. The Bank of New York Mellon Corp et al
as 2:2020cv02088
Defendant:
Wesley W. Von Schack, Thomas P. Gibbons, J. P. Sellers and others
Plaintiff:
Glicenia C. Logan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
