Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1652
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
MINDY POSOFF, Managing Director, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1321
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Prince Ellis, et al v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, et al
as 24-1336
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
ELLIS et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
PRINCE R. ELLIS, MICKEY M. ELLIS and VERONA E.T. ELLIS
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE COMPTROLLER PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH DEPT., THE OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER OPERATIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv04018
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Lawson v. Ailn et al
as 1:2010cv01063
Plaintiff:
James R. Lawson
Defendant:
J. Ailn, Scott Anderson, Carolyne M. Batchelor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawson v. Fleming et al
as 1:2010cv00900
Plaintiff:
James R. Lawson
Defendant:
Nike Fleming, Graham Fuller, Barbara H. Glogiewicz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv04163
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv01721
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
