Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Davis v Dookhan, et al.
as 4:2020cv40017
Plaintiff:
Shawn Davis
Defendant:
Annie Dookhan, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS and Middlesex District Attorney's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz v. Han et al
as 1:2017cv12485
Plaintiff:
Roberto Ortiz
Defendant:
Linda Han, Julianne Nassif, Charles Salemi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Dookhan, et al
as 17-1704
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RODRIGUEZ, DARREN MCFADDEN, KENNETH WALLACE and others
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARRY H. SPENCER, II
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNIE DOOKHAN, DANIELLA FRASCA, MARTIN J. WALSH and others
Blake v. Commonwealth of MA, et al
as 16-2279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EMERSON BLAKE
Defendant - Appellee:
ANNIE DOOKHAN and JULIE NASSIF
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, CHARLES SALEMI and LINDA HAN
Spencer, II v. Dookhan et al
as 1:2016cv12076
Plaintiff:
Barry Spencer, II
Defendant:
Annie Dookhan, Daniella Frasca, Martin J. Walsh and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Paul McKenzie and Jose L. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
BLAKE v. DOOKHAN et al
as 1:2015cv13867
Plaintiff:
EMERSON BLAKE
Defendant:
ANNIE DOOKHAN, COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Charles Salemi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Luna v. Campbell et al
as 1:2015cv11477
Plaintiff:
Pascual Luna
Defendant:
Matthew Campbell, Officer Hamilton, Rishi Gupta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGinnis v. Han et al
as 1:2015cv10234
Plaintiff:
Leon McGinnis
Defendant:
Linda Han, Nicole Medina, Julie Nassif and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Han et al
as 1:2014cv13274
Plaintiff:
Leonardo Johnson
Defendant:
Linda Han, Julie Nassif, Charles Salemi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dioguardi et al v. Dookhan et al
as 1:2013cv11346
Defendant:
Annie Dookhan, Matthew McDonnel, Andrew Lipson and others
Plaintiff:
Josesph Dioguardi and Jean Exilus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
