Cases 1 - 10 of 179
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Logan Brainerd v. Chad Ward, et al
as 24-1152
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Miller County Sheriff's Office, Lt. Ontravarious, Miller County Sheriff's Office, Chief Clerk and all Clerks Involved from Miller County, AR and others
Logan Brainerd v. Chad Ward, et al
as 24-1124
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Sheriff Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Department and others
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. K. Cauley, et al
as 23-3306
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark T. Stinson, Sr.
Defendant / Appellee:
K. Cauley, BOP Officer FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, Hall, Asst. Warden, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity, Thomas, Camp Admin, FCI Forrest City, AR. Sued in individual and official capacity and others
Brainerd v. Ward et al
as 4:2023cv04066
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Judge Tommy Potter, Miller County Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brainerd v. Ward, et al
as 4:2023cv04067
Plaintiff:
Logan Hunter Brainerd
Defendant:
Chad Ward, Lt. Ontravarious, Chief Clerk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cedric Greene v. Garland County, AR
as 23-5542
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CEDRIC GREENE
Defendant / Appellee:
GARLAND COUNTY, AR
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
