Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jones v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv00494
Plaintiff:
Frederick Jones
Defendant:
Arkansas Insurance Department and Latonya Honorable
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Dudley v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2024cv04055
Plaintiff:
Karanya-Marquis Dudley
Defendant:
Arkansas Insurance Department and State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Matthew Glass v. Allen Kerr
as 22-2363
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Matthew Glass
Defendant:
Arkansas Insurance Department, Marjorie Farmer, individually, and in her official capacity as Investigator for the Arkansas Insurance Department and Alan McClain, in his official capacity as Commissioner for the Arkansas Insurance Department
Defendant / Appellant:
Allen Kerr, individually, and in his official capacity as Commissioner for the Arkansas Insurance Department
Glass v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 2:2020cv00041
Plaintiff:
Matthew Glass
Defendant:
Arkansas Insurance Department, Marjorie Farmer and Allen Kerr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Thomas et al v. Arkansas Insurance Department
as 4:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Bradley Neal Thomas and Thomas & Associates Agency Inc
Defendant:
Arkansas Insurance Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Yvonne Dockery v. City of Garland
as 11-3790
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Yvonne A. Dockery
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Garland, c/o Arkansas Insurance Department Risk Management Division
Harvey v. Arkansas Insurance Department et al
as 4:2007cv00077
Plaintiff:
Loretta Harvey
Defendant:
Arkansas Insurance Department, Arkansas Insurance Commission and Reliable Life Companies
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
