Civil Rights Cases filed in Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02002
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (other)
Beasley v. Hargrove et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00100
Plaintiff: Dayton Beasley
Defendant: Michael Hargrove and John Does 1-50
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harpo v. Intermark Management Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00087
Defendant: Ramone Lamkin, Sierra Doe, Vera L. Butler and others
Plaintiff: Wihly Harpo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Burney et al v. Fulton County, Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv01770
Defendant: Sgt. Jessica Stewart, Detention Officer Tyana Hanks, Lt. Colonel Kirt Beasley and others
Plaintiff: Kevaughn Burney, Kemal Burney and Kevin Burney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv01450
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00059
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv04359
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03071
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2015cv00007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Strong v. Fulton County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2014cv03703
Plaintiff: Tammy Strong
Defendant: Fulton County Board of Commissioners, Theodore Jackson, Mark Alger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?