Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Carter v. Brimmer
as 1:2022cv00944
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Carter
Defendant:
Phillip Brimmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clervrain et al v. Brimmer et al
as 1:2022cv00006
Plaintiff:
Manetiony Clervrain, Fabrice Thomas, Wislene Casy and others
Defendant:
Philip A. Brimmer, David DLG Atalig, Tom Kucharski and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Adams v. City of Syracuse et al
as 5:2021cv00650
Defendant:
Police Officer Matthew Lalonde, Police Officer Ryan Brimmer, Police Officer Matthew Arduini and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Adams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARPER v. BRIMMER et al
as 3:2017cv00390
Plaintiff:
MONTOREY DANYELL HARPER
Defendant:
REBECCA BRIMMER, EDWARD HARPER, SR and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kenneth Smith v. Antonin Scalia, et al
as 14-5180
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kenneth L. Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas, John G. Roberts and others
SMITH v. REECE et al
as 1:2013cv01610
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
DEANELLE TACHA REECE, ANTONIN G. SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brimmer v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2013cv04446
Plaintiff:
Shelita Brimmer
Defendant:
New Orleans City, Department of Safety and Permits, Annunciation LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
SMITH v. SCALIA et al
as 1:2013cv00298
Plaintiff:
KENNETH L. SMITH
Defendant:
ANTONIN SCALIA, CLARENCE THOMAS, JOHN G. ROBERTS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Brimmer v. Shinseki
as 3:2011cv01956
Plaintiff:
Viola Brimmer
Defendant:
Eric K Shinseki
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
