Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gonzalez et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 2:2021at00632
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Gonzalez and H.G.
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, Jeff Dirkse, Chad Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gonzalez et al v. County of Stanislaus et al
as 1:2021cv01091
Plaintiff:
Maria Teresa Gonzalez and H.G.
Defendant:
County of Stanislaus, Jeff Dirkse, Chad Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayes v. FT LA Cascada TIC, LLC et al
as 3:2020cv01801
Defendant:
Does 1 Through 10, FT LA Cascada TIC, LLC, Borba Investment Realty, Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Russell Hayes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00166
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-16755
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fabiola Villalvazo et al v. Borba Investment Realty, Inc. et al
as 8:2014cv00454
Plaintiff:
A.C., A.C., Jose Castillo and others
Defendant:
Borba Investment Realty, Inc., Jorge Prado and Julie Prado
Villalvazo et al v. Borba Investment Realty, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02182
Defendant:
Borba Investment Realty, Inc., J&J Apartment Rentals Cedar Location, LLC, Jorge Prado and others
Plaintiff:
A. C., A. C., Jose Castillo and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2013cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bailey v. City Of Fayetteville et al
as 5:2009cv00461
Plaintiff:
Robert Gene Bailey
Defendant:
City Of Fayetteville, Fayetteville Police Department, Chief Tom Bergamine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
