Cases 1 - 10 of 62
RICHARDS v. CITY OF DURHAM
as 1:2024cv00955
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM
Plaintiff:
CORNELL RICHARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
CITY OF DURHAM v. DURHAM HOUSING AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2024cv00885
Intervenor:
CYNTHIA ALSTON-CASH
Plaintiff:
CITY OF DURHAM
Defendant:
DURHAM HOUSING AUTHORITY, DOMINIQUE DUNN, EILEEN LEWANDOWSKI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601 Fair Housing Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
HOLSEY-HYMAN v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2024cv00296
Plaintiff:
Monique Holsey-Hyman
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, Kimberly Rehberg, Mark Anthony Middleton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
ALLEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, N.C. STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JENNIFER ELWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
ALLEN v. COOPER et al
as 1:2023cv03616
Plaintiff:
DERRICK ALLEN
Defendant:
ROY COOPER, N.C. STATE BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, JENNIFER ELWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
ARMSTRONG v. NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2023cv00378
Plaintiff:
ARTHUR O. ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA, CITY OF DURHAM and CJ DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DOWDY v. CITY OF DURHAM
as 1:2023cv00133
Plaintiff:
DARRELL L. DOWDY
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
