Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Settles v. City of Garfield Heights et al
as 1:2020cv01631
Defendant:
Robert Pitts, City of Garfield Heights and Michael Malak
Plaintiff:
Kenta Settles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Settles v. Malak et al
as 1:2020cv01288
Plaintiff:
Kenta Settles
Defendant:
Patrolman Brian Regovich, City of Garfield Heights, Sergeant William Gall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Filing Error
as 1:2018cv01763
Defendant:
Jane Doe, City of Garfield Heights, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spencer v. Falzini
as 1:2018cv01764
Defendant:
Jane Doe, City of Garfield Heights, John doe and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Spencer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallingford v. City of Garfield Heights
as 1:2018cv00509
Plaintiff:
Francis Wallingford
Defendant:
City of Garfield Heights
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARRADICE et al v. CITY OF GARFIELD et al
as 2:2017cv11722
Plaintiff:
ROMAINE CARRADICE and R J
Defendant:
CITY OF GARFIELD , RAYMOND KOVACH , RONALD BOHANNON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Wiggins v. Dupont et al
as 1:2017cv01107
Defendant:
City of Garfield Heights , David Dupont and Timothy Tatulinski
Plaintiff:
De'Angelo Wiggins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HEINE et al v. DIRECTOR OF CODES AND STANDARDS et al
as 2:2015cv08210
Plaintiff:
ELLEN HEINE, CHRISTOPHER GRIECO, KARA GRIECO and others
Defendant:
DIRECTOR OF CODES AND STANDARDS, BUREAU CHIEF, DIVISION OF FIRE AND SAFETY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lardieri v. Dupont et al
as 1:2015cv02258
Defendant:
David Dupont, City of Garfield Heights and John Does
Plaintiff:
Gregory Lardieri
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joseph Fabics, et al v. City of New Brunswick, et al
as 15-3345
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSEPH FABICS, MOSES WILLIAMS, UNITA PERI-OKONNY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, TOWNSHIP OF NORTH BRUNSWICK, CITY OF GARFIELD and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
