Cases 1 - 10 of 14
McKenna v. HP Incorporated et al
as 3:2021cv08271
Plaintiff:
Annette-Lynn McKenna
Defendant:
HP Incorporated, Enquire Lores, Christoph Shell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McCormick et al v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Domestic Division et al
as 2:2019cv02941
Defendant:
Catherine White, Hsiu-Chen Lu, Columbus Division of Police and others
Plaintiff:
Moses McCormick and Mark McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01567
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00370
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv01696
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01821
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt v. Office of Civil Rights et al
as 2:2012cv00613
Plaintiff:
Eddie L Pratt
Defendant:
Office of Civil Rights, Colorado Department of Education and Gateway Community College
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2009cv01082
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Gene Cole Scott
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Motor Vehicle, Department of, Municipal Court Civil Division and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00273
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00916
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
