Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00045
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 FMLA: Family and Medical Leave Act (Findings and Purposes)
Mossman et al v. United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention et al
as 1:2021cv00028
Plaintiff:
Asa Mossman, Richard McConkie, Millstone Properties, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Rochelle P. Walensky, Norris Cochran, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv03053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Todd v. Sioux City Engineering Co et al
as 5:2020cv04022
Defendant:
Sioux City Engineering Co, Jeff LNU, Jesus Navarette and others
Plaintiff:
Adam Charles Todd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv04063
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv03035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
