Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Ginese v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection et al
as 3:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Ginese
Defendant:
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Thom Porter, David Fulcher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cv Civil Rights Act - Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights
Ralph Duran, et al v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protect, et al
as 23-16155
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RALPH DURAN and MICHAEL ESPARZA
Defendant / Appellee:
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FORESTRY AND FIRE PROTECTION, JOE TYLER, in his official capacity as Director of the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN RESOURCES (CALHR) and others
Duran et al v. California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection et al
as 3:2022cv06120
Plaintiff:
Ralph Duran and Michael Esparza
Defendant:
California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Joe Tyler, California Department of Human Resources (CalHR) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Lo et al v. County of Siskiyou et al
as 2:2021cv00999
Defendant:
Jeremiah LaRue, Brandon Criss, Jesus Fernandez and others
Plaintiff:
Dilevon Lo, Pao Lee, Nathan Thao and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hathaway v. McCarroll et al
as 1:2018cv01155
Defendant:
Thomas W. Porter, Jeffrey S. McCarroll and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Plaintiff:
Kyle R. Hathaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Vang et al v. Nishimura et al
as 2:2017at00103
Plaintiff:
Jesse Vang , Wang Chang , Joua Chao Moua and others
Defendant:
Alex Nishimura, County of Siskiyou and California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05637
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv09328
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
