Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Americans with Disabilities Act
Quiroz-Montano v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2021cv02015
Defendant:
Arizona OB/GYN Affiliates, Christopher Kevin Huls, Kristen Kidd and others
Plaintiff:
Dechoal Marie Quiroz-Montano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Polk v. King et al
as 2:2021cv00948
Defendant:
King, Bret King, Jim Guschi and others
Plaintiff:
Polk and Hillary Charles Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Apache Stronghold v. United States of America et al
as 2:2021cv00050
Defendant:
Sonny Perdue, Neil Bosworth, Vicki Christensen and others
Plaintiff:
Apache Stronghold
Amicus Curiae:
MICA Group, Morningstar Institute and Ramon Riley
Intervenor Defendant:
Resolution Copper Mining LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Oneal v. Flint et al
as 4:2017cv00354
Plaintiff:
Jerry Oneal
Defendant:
Jason Flint, William Leonard, Donald Napier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunt v. Davis et al
as 3:2016cv08280
Plaintiff:
Timothy Hunt
Defendant:
Asher Davis, Sarah Davis, Nathan Christensen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01392
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hall v. Mesa, City of et al
as 2:2014cv02803
Plaintiff:
Lee I Hall
Defendant:
Mesa, City of , Mesa Police Department , Frank Milstead and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv00760
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
