Cases 1 - 10 of 25
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Reaves et al v. Kyler et al
as 1:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kathy Reaves, Tiesha Danielle Evans and Dmitri A. Reaves
Defendant:
David Levert Kyler, Officer Sutton, County of Richmond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. BET Entertainment et al
as 1:2023cv00196
Defendant:
Stokes & Stokes Law Firm, BET Entertainment, Stokes & Stokes and others
Plaintiff:
Emanuel Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Estate of Tyler J. Meier v. Eau Claire County et al
as 3:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
Estate of Tyler J. Meier
Defendant:
Eau Claire County, City of Augusta, Gordon O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00099
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00004
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
MERRILL et al v. DUNLAP et al
as 1:2020cv00248
Defendant:
CITY OF PORTLAND, KATHERINE JONES, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE and others
Plaintiff:
CHERYL PEABODY, PAULINE LAMONTAGNE, LYNN MERRILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00055
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hesed-El v. City of Augusta-Richmond County et al
as 1:2017cv00165
Plaintiff:
Bro. T. Hesed-El
Defendant:
City of Augusta-Richmond County, William D. Jennings, III, Vickie W. Hester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
Howard v. Ross et al
as 1:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Lori Ann Howard
Defendant:
Alveno Ross and The City of Augusta Richmond County Georgia Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
